Pages

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Hungry anyone?


Saw this on salon.com and giggled.

Perception of Violence part I

Several years ago I became interested in the concept of adventure motorcycling. I'm not sure what the correct definition is or even if there is one, but I'd sum it up by saying it's riding in unfamiliar and potentially dangerous areas far from your home. It didn't take much searching to find on websites like advrider.com or horizonsunlimited.com which had thousands of first hand accounts of men and women who were riding their bikes in every corner of the world usually without a safety net. Just their own courage and wits to see them safely to the next town and eventually home. The dream was born and I was going to be an adventure rider too. Mexico was my logical choice for my first (and so far only) adv ride. It bordered the US, offered different cultures and terrains and I'd been there several times before. Now when I said I'd been there what I meant to say is I'd been to the Yucatan; Cozumel, Playa Del Carmen, Tulum. Certainly different than the US but not adventurous. I mean if Uncle Fred can make it two weeks in Cancun wearing the usual tourist uniform, tropical shirt, ill fitting khaki shorts and sandals with black socks, it can't be that dangerous. I mean seriously, how long would Fred last wandering Detroit in that outfit?

With Mexico as my destination I began to research. I bought maps and guide books, I read accounts of riders old and current trips to Mexico and I talked to those around me. It was the people around me that raised the most alarm. "You're going to do what?", "You can't ride through, Mexico, it's too dangerous", "There's a drug war going on, they'll kill you", "banditos, kidnapping, rape, mayhem!". Jesus (the Mexican pronunciation), was it really that bad? I listened to my friends and families but I also listened to the riders who had been there. Almost to a person they said Mexico was safe. In fact many of them felt safer in Mexico than in the US.

So, I went. Me and a buddy rode seven thousand miles in Mexico without a single problem. After the first few days I felt comfortable and very safe. We followed precautions. Basically we did what any thinking person would do. We didn't flash cash around, not that we had any. If we got drunk it was with people we trusted and we tried very hard not to ride at night (that requires more explanation, read my blog account of the ride at motolocogringo.blogspot.com).

During the ride I often thought about the perception of Mexican violence in the US. Where did we get this perception? Why did most American's believe Mexico was a wild and dangerous country? Most importantly was this belief validated? From my own point of view it wasn't. So what led me to my own version of perception? My experiences have often showed me that reality is often very different from perception. Unfortunately perception is reality if that person believes it. As a young man I lived in Germany while serving in the Army. I traveled Europe as much as I could and found time after time that stereotypes (perceptions) of people and cultures were often at odds with what I was told to expect. What changed most during my four years living in Europe was my perception of my home country, the United States. I was told time and time again that America is the greatest country on Earth and I agree. I guess my perception was that because we were such great innovators, everything we did was better than everywhere else. I saw so many things being done more efficiently and better than we were doing back home. This changed my perception of perception. These experiences and many more like them have made me question perception in pursuit of fact.

So, what perception is reality? Is Mexico a lawless wasteland where banditos roam without fear and murder anyone in path? Or is it safe place that struggles with crime like every other country? Or is it something else altogether? Honestly, there's no way I can answer these questions but I can provide some insight. Part II will follow shortly.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Difference between a liberal and a conservative

Much is made by the conservatives and particularly right wing conservatives that liberals love to "tax and spend". The hypocrisy in that statement is laughable. Just look at the fiscal records of the last two presidents and it's easy to see this argument is horseshit. Under Clinton we had a balanced budget and deficits were heading down. Now, let's talk a look at GW's record. Ewww, not pretty. The fiscal conservative that he is led to record budget deficits and sky rocketing national debts. Now a they'll be quick to point out our current president's budgets. Makes sense when you have to clean up the fucking mess he inherited.

So as it pertains to spending, what's the real difference between a liberal and a conservative? A conservative would rather spend our nation's treasury invading a country which had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. In the process thousands of American troops died during this escapade and tens of thousands more were injured. This is a good time to remind everyone that hundreds of thousands Iraqis were murdered as well. But to a conservative they don't matter. A conservative would rather spend our money on a drug war so stupid and costly ($52 billion a year) even a dmwit like Rush "Pass me the pain killers" Limbaugh should be able to see the waste. A conservative would rather spend our treasure on weapons systems designed for cold war opponents, especially if they're produced in their districts. So what would a liberal spend the same money on? How about education? Fixing a crumbling education system which each year falls further behind the rest of the world. A liberal would spend that money on health care. Ensuring Americans are provided a health care system which is efficient and affordable. We would build roads, fix the bridges, invest in green technology and in short save this country. That my friends is the difference between a liberal and a conservative.

Ack, can't take the pressure!

The very first post. Is it a make or break moment? If it's stupid and nobody likes it will this blog fail? Or conversely if it's regarded as a blogging masterpiece will I have to build a warehouse to store my collection of classic cars? I really don't give a fuck. Ok, that's not entirely true. I do care a little. I hope people read this and join in on the debate. I hope people tell me I'm wrong or correct my grammar or nit pick the way some morons do. It's ok I invite it.

So what can people expect? An open and at times non-politically correct discussion about all things. Mainly though, politics, pop culture, Wal Mart people, satire, hypocrisy, lying rat bastards, sports, really anything that comes to mind.

Some might want to know why I'm blogging. Basically because I'm egotistical and believe everyone should hear what I have to say. That doesn't mean I'm always right. But I am conscientious and have some knowledge before I blab it to the blogosphere.

Next up, who am I? As I write this I'm a 43 year old white male, small business owner, generally liberal but certainly would be considered conservative in some areas and libertarian in others. I grew up poor until middle school when my single mother clawed her way into the middle class, thanks in no small part at times to government assistance. I spent over eight years in the US Army. All of these things certainly have shaped my views of the world. I'm not a stereotypical liberal. What I am is someone who thinks and comes to his own conclusions.

So that's it. I sincerely invite all points of view. At times the discourse may get heated. If I touch a nerve, tell me intelligently why I was wrong before you tell me to "fuck off". I promise to do the same.